Mối liên kết gia đình phi chính thức và năng lực đổi mới sáng tạo quốc gia: bằng chứng xuyên quốc gia từ Chỉ số Phức tạp Kinh tế

https://doi.org/10.31130/ud-jst.2026.24(8).199E

Tóm tắt: 0 | PDF: 1

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Author

  • Nguyen Thi Thuy
    The University of Danang - University of Economics, Vietnam
    Ngo Thi My Hoa
    Warwick Business School, The University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Từ khóa:

Mối liên kết gia đình
năng lực đổi mới sáng tạo quốc gia
Chỉ số Phức tạp Kinh tế
vốn xã hội
thể chế phi chính thức

Tóm tắt

Mặc dù vai trò của thể chế chính thức trong việc định hình năng lực đổi mới sáng tạo quốc gia đã được thừa nhận rộng rãi, ảnh hưởng của thể chế phi chính thức vẫn chưa có kết luận thống nhất. Nghiên cứu này xem xét mối liên kết gia đình, một thể chế phi chính thức, có thể ảnh hưởng đến năng lực đổi mới sáng tạo quốc gia thông qua ba cơ chế: mức độ cởi mở đối với tri thức và hợp tác bên ngoài, thái độ đối với chấp nhận rủi ro và phân bổ nguồn lực dựa trên năng lực. Sử dụng Chỉ số Phức tạp Kinh tế (ECI) làm đại diện cho đổi mới sáng tạo, kết quả cho thấy mối liên kết gia đình có quan hệ tiêu cực với năng lực đổi mới sáng tạo. Nghiên cứu góp phần xác định vai trò của mối liên kết gia đình ở cấp quốc gia, phân biệt vốn xã hội gắn kết với vốn xã hội kết nối, và nhấn mạnh tính hữu ích của ECI trong đo lường năng lực đổi mới sáng tạo.

Tài liệu tham khảo

    [1] J. L. Furman, M. E. Porter, and S. Stern, “The determinants of national innovative capacity,” Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 899–933, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4.
    [2] M. Porter and S. Stern, The New Challenge to America’s Prosperity: Findings from the Innovation Index. Washington, DC, USA: Council on Competitiveness, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-New-Challenge-to-America%27s-Prosperity%3A-Findings-Porter-Stern/2fa8dbc8a764907405a2f18e7cd84d9e143c18f5 [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2026].
    [3] S. Shane, “Cultural influences on national rates of innovation,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–73, Jan. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90011-S.
    [4] C. Hussler, “Culture and knowledge spillovers in Europe: New perspectives for innovation and convergence policies?”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 13, pp. 523–541, Feb. 2004, doi: 10.1080/1043859042000234302.
    [5] M. Didero, K. Gareis, and P. Marques, “Differences in innovation culture across Europe: A discussion paper,” Transform: Benchmarking and Fostering Transformative Use of ICT in EU Regions, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Differences-in-Innovation-Culture-Across-Europe-Didero-Gareis/84f83279282705e1341546a83b3d564c62565b2a [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2026].
    [6] B.-Å. Lundvall, National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Anthem Press, 2010.
    [7] A. Kaasa and M. Vadi, “How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 583–604, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1080/10438590902987222.
    [8] A. Kaasa, “Culture as a Possible Factor of Innovation: Evidence from the European Union and Neighboring Countries,” in Re-thinking Diversity: Multiple Approaches in Theory, Media, Communities, and Managerial Practice, C. Braedel-Kühner and A. Müller, Eds., Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 2016, pp. 83–107. Accessed: Mar. 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11502-9_5
    [9] P. Cox and R. Khan, “Country Culture and National Innovation,” Archives of Business Research, vol. 5, pp. 85–101, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.14738/abr.52.2768.
    [10] A. Alesina and P. Giuliano, “Family Ties,” in Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 2, Elsevier, 2014, pp. 177–215, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53538-2.00004-6.
    [11] A. Alesina and P. Giuliano, “Family ties and political participation,” Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 817–839, 2011.
    [12] A. Alesina and P. Giuliano, “The power of the family,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 93–125, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10887-010-9052-z.
    [13] E. Todd, The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structures and Social Systems. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.
    [14] Y. Algan, A. Alesina, P. Cahuc, and P. Giuliano, “Family values and the regulation of labor,” Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 13, no. 2–3, pp. 599–630, 2015.
    [15] A. Greif, Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    [16] G. Duranton, A. Rodriguez-Pose, and R. Sandall, “Family types and the persistence of regional disparities in Europe,” Economic Geography, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 23–47, 2009.
    [17] A. Greif and G. Tabellini, “Cultural and institutional bifurcation: China and Europe compared,” American Economic Review, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 135–140, 2010.
    [18] V. Galasso and P. Profeta, “When the state mirrors the family: The design of pension systems,” Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1712–1763, 2018.
    [19] G. Esping-Andersen, “Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies,” in Social Stratification, Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, 2nd ed., London: Routledge, 2019, pp. 830–845.
    [20] J. Ermisch and D. Gambetta, “Do Strong Family Ties Inhibit Trust?”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 365–376, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.007.
    [21] K. M. Murphy, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, “The Allocation of Talent: Implications for Growth,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 503–530, 1991.
    [22] C.-T. Hsieh, E. Hurst, C. I. Jones, and P. J. Klenow, “The Allocation of Talent and U.S. Economic Growth,” Econometrica, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 1439–1474, 2019.
    [23] J. A. Schumpeter, Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1939.
    [24] G. Ahuja, “The Duality of Collaboration: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 317–343, 2000, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317:AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO;2-B.
    [25] H. Chesbrough, “The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property,” California Management Review, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 33–58, 2003.
    [26] H. W. Chesbrough, “Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models,” MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 22–28, 2007.
    [27] C. Dhanaraj and A. Parkhe, “Orchestrating Innovation Networks,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 659–669, 2006.
    [28] D. Obstfeld, M. J. Ventresca, and G. Fisher, “An Assembly Perspective of Entrepreneurial Projects: Social Networks in Action,” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 149–177, 2020.
    [29] E. C. Banfield, The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York: Free Press, 1958.
    [30] J. S. Coleman, “Commentary: Social Institutions and Social Theory,” American Sociological Review, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 333–339, 1990.
    [31] J. S. Coleman, Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
    [32] R. Hausmann et al., “The Atlas of Economic Complexity,” Harvard CID Working Paper, 2011.
    [33] C. M. Sweet and G. Maggio, “Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation?”, World Development, vol. 66, pp. 665–677, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.025.
    [34] W. R. Scott, Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.
    [35] D. C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
    [36] B.-Å. Lundvall and B. Johnson, “The learning economy and the Economics of Hope,” Journal of Industry Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 23–42, 1994.
    [37] L. Soete and C. Freeman, The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Routledge, 2012.
    [38] G. Schiuma and A. Lerro, “Knowledge-based dynamics of regional development: The case of innovation capacity,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 5–21, 2008.
    [39] M. M. Natário, A. M. Braga, and J. P. Couto, “Evaluating the determinants of national innovative capacity among European countries,” Global Journal of Management and Business Research, vol. 11, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume11/6.Evaluating-The-Determinants-Of-National-Innovative.pdf [Accessed: Jan. 02, 2026].
    [40] C. Bjørnskov, “How does social trust affect economic growth?”, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1346–1368, 2012, doi: 10.4284/0038-4038-78.4.1346.
    [41] F. Fukuyama, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press, 1995.
    [42] S. Moreira, A. Markus, and K. Laursen, “Knowledge Diversity and Coordination: The Effect of Intrafirm Inventor Task Networks on Absorption Speed,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2517–2546, 2018.
    [43] A. Sammarra and L. Biggiero, “Heterogeneity and Specificity of Inter-Firm Knowledge Flows in Innovation Networks,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 800–829, 2008.
    [44] M. Bertrand and A. Schoar, “The Role of Family in Family Firms,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 73–96, 2006, doi: 10.1257/jep.20.2.73.
    [45] A. Alesina and P. Giuliano, “Culture and institutions,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 898–944, 2015, doi: 10.1257/jel.53.4.898.
    [46] World Values Survey Association, “World Values Survey: All rounds - country-pooled datafile version,” World Values Survey, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp [Accessed: Jan. 02, 2026].
    [47] European Values Study, “European Values Study,” Data and Documentation. [Online]. Available: https://europeanvaluesstudy.eu/methodology-data-documentation/data-and-documentation/ [Accessed: Jan. 02, 2026].
    [48] R. Hausmann, J. Hwang, and D. Rodrik, “What you export matters,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4.
    [49] M. H. Nasir and S. Zhang, “Evaluating innovative factors of the global innovation index: A panel data approach,” Innovation and Green Development, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 100096, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.igd.2023.100096.
    [50] R. Anand, S. Mishra, and N. Spatafora, “Structural transformation and the sophistication of production,” IMF Working Paper, vol. 2012, no. 059, 2012.
    [51] World Bank, “World Bank DataBank,” DataBank. [Online]. Available: https://databank.worldbank.org/ [Accessed: Jan. 02, 2026].
    [52] M. G. Marshall and K. Jaggers, “Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions,” Center for Systemic Peace. [Online]. Available: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm [Accessed: Jan. 02, 2026].
    [53] Property Rights Alliance, “International Property Rights Index 2020–2023,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://internationalpropertyrightsindex.org/ [Accessed: Jan. 02, 2026].
    [54] Y. Chen and T. Puttitanun, “Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 474–493, 2005.
    [55] D. Rodrik, A. Subramanian, and F. Trebbi, “Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 131–165, 2004, doi: 10.1023/B: JOEG.0000031425.72248.85.
    [56] T. T. Nguyen, T. H. Duong, M. T. T. Dinh, T. T. M. Truong, and T. H. H. Pham, “The Role of Social Trust on Property Right Protection: Physical Property Versus Intellectual Property,” International Economic Journal, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 177–201, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10168737.2023.2193159.
    [57] D. Kaufmann, A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi, “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, vol. 3, pp. 220–246, 2010, doi: 10.1017/S1876404511200046.
    [58] S. Edwards, “Openness, productivity and growth: what do we really know?”, Economic Journal, vol. 108, no. 447, pp. 383–398, 1998, doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00293.
    [59] R. Steenbrink and A. Skali, “Wealth inequality and economic growth: Evidence from the World Inequality Database,” World Development, vol. 199, p. 107250, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107250.
    [60] N. N. Vu, “Innovation in higher education management to improve training quality,” The University of Danang - Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 7–9, 2021.
    [61] B. Q. Binh, “Restructuring service industries based on science, technology, and innovation in Da Nang City,” The University of Danang - Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 8–13, 2023
Xem thêm

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Đã Xuất bản

Aug 31, 2026
Download
PDF (English)
Cách trích dẫn
Thuy, N. T., và N. T. M. Hoa. “Mối Liên kết Gia đình Phi chính thức Và năng lực đổi mới sáng tạo quốc Gia: Bằng chứng Xuyên quốc Gia từ Chỉ số Phức tạp Kinh Tế”. Tạp Chí Khoa học Và Công nghệ Đại học Đà Nẵng, vol 24, số p.h 8, Tháng Tám 2026, tr 40-51, doi:10.31130/ud-jst.2026.24(8).199E.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##