Using a Bi-Level Optimization Model for Assessing the Impact of Demand Forecast Uncertainty on the Maximum Profit of Power Distribution Companies Owning Energy Storage Systems

https://doi.org/10.31130/ud-jst.2022.107E
Tóm tắt: 35 | PDF: 46

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Author

  • Dang Vu Kien
    School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology and Institute of Energy, Vietnam
    Le Thi Minh Chau
    School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam
    Pham Quang Phuong
    School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam
    Pham Nang Van
    School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam

Từ khóa:

Bi-level optimization
energy storage systems
the demand forecast uncertainty
power distribution companies
electricity markets

Tóm tắt

This paper proposes a bi-level optimization model to maximize the net revenue of a power distribution company owning energy storage systems. Furthermore, the proposed model also takes into account the uncertainty of load forecast based on a set of multiple scenarios in order to assess its impact on the maximum net revenue of the power distribution company. This bi-level optimization model is transformed into the single-level mixed-integer linear programming model by using the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions and strong duality theorem. This single-level optimization formulation can be effectively solved by using standard commercial solvers such as CPLEX. The proposed model and the effects of the load forecast uncertainty on the net revenue of the power distribution company are validated and analyzed on an IEEE 24-bus meshed transmission grid.

Tài liệu tham khảo

    [1] D. Pozo, J. Contreras, and E. E. Sauma, “Unit commitment with ideal and generic energy storage units,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2974–2984, 2014.
    [2] X. Fang, B.-M. Hodge, L. Bai, H. Cui, and F. Li, “Meanvariance optimization-based energy storage scheduling considering day-ahead and real-time lmp uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 7292–7295, 2018.
    [3] G. He, Q. Chen, C. Kang, P. Pinson, and Q. Xia, “Optimal bidding strategy of battery storage in power markets considering performance-based regulation and battery cycle life,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2359–2367, 2015.
    [4] M. Kazemi, H. Zareipour, N. Amjady, W. D. Rosehart, and M. Ehsan, “Operation scheduling of battery storage systems in joint energy and ancillary services markets,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1726–1735, 2017.
    [5] M. Khojasteh, P. Faria, and Z. Vale, “Scheduling of battery energy storages in the joint energy and reserve markets based on the static frequency of power system,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 49, pp. 104–115, 2022.
    [6] N. Padmanabhan, M. Ahmed, and K. Bhattacharya, “Battery energy storage systems in energy and reserve markets,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 215–226, 2019.
    [7] H. Cui, F. Li, X. Fang, H. Chen, and H. Wang, “Bilevel arbitrage potential evaluation for grid-scale energy storage considering wind power and lmp smoothing effect,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 707–718, 2017.
    [8] Y. Dvorkin, R. Fern´andez-Blanco, D. S. Kirschen, H. Pandˇzi´c, J.-P. Watson, and C. A. Silva-Monroy, “Ensuring profitability of energy storage,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 611–623, 2017.
    [9] Y. Wang, Y. Dvorkin, R. Fern´andez-Blanco, B. Xu, T. Qiu, and D. S. Kirschen, “Look-ahead bidding strategy for energy storage,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1106–1117, 2017.
    [10] E. Nasrolahpour, J. Kazempour, H. Zareipour, and W. D. Rosehart, “A bilevel model for participation of a storage system in energy and reserve markets,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 582–598, 2017.
    [11] J. Matouˇsek and B. G¨artner, Understanding and Using Linear Programming. Springer, 2006.
    [12] J. Fortuny-Amat and B. McCarl, “A representation and economic interpretation of a two-level programming problem,” Journal of the operational Research Society, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 783–792, 1981.
    [13] C. Ordoudis, P. Pinson, J. M. Morales, and M. Zugno, “An updated version of the IEEE RTS 24-bus system for electricity market and power system operation studies,” Technical University of Denmark, vol. 13, 2016.
    [14] C. Barrows, A. Bloom, A. Ehlen, J. Ik¨aheimo, J. Jorgenson, D. Krishnamurthy, J. Lau, B. McBennett, M. O’Connell, E. Preston et al., “The IEEE reliability test system: A proposed 2019 update,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 119–127, 2019.
    [15] G. S. GmbH, “GAMS - cutting edge modeling,” Nov 1996. [Online]. Available: https://www.gams.com/
Xem thêm

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Đã Xuất bản

Jun 30, 2022
Download
PDF (English)
Cách trích dẫn
Kien, D. V., L. T. M. Chau, P. Q. Phuong, và P. N. Van. “Using a Bi-Level Optimization Model for Assessing the Impact of Demand Forecast Uncertainty on the Maximum Profit of Power Distribution Companies Owning Energy Storage Systems”. Tạp Chí Khoa học Và Công nghệ - Đại học Đà Nẵng, vol 20, số p.h 6.2, Tháng Sáu 2022, tr 69-76, doi:10.31130/ud-jst.2022.107E.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Các bài báo được đọc nhiều nhất của cùng tác giả