Factors affecting on time graduation of students within the prescribed period: a case study at the University of Danang - University of Science and Education
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Author
-
Nguyen Thi QuyThe University of Danang - University of Science and Education, Danang, Vietnam
Keywords:
Abstract
Statistics from The University of Danang - University of Science and Education announced that there were a number of students who were not eligible to graduate on time, of which the main reason is related to academic results. Using survey methodologies on 240 samples, this study examines the factors influencing the academic success of undergraduate students who arrive on time. It then builds a multiple linear regression model to predict the outcomes of student learning. The findings indicated that there were seven factors influence how well students learn, including: (1) the suppoting policies fror students; (2) the role of mentors; (3) the role of lecturers; (4) the concern of parents; (5) learning motivation; (6) self-study ability; and (7) learning style. The most important one among them is the self-study ability of the students. Subsequently, study findings serve as the foundation for suggestions aimed at enhancing students' learning outcomes.
References
-
[1] Otter, “Learning Outcomes in Higher Education”, in Outcomes, Learning And The Curriculum, 1st ed., London: Routledge, 1995, p. 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203485835.
[2] Allan, “Learning outcomes in higher education”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 93–108, Jan. 1996, doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381487.
[3] R. Young, B. R. Klemz, and J. W. Murphy, “Enhancing Learning Outcomes: The Effects of Instructional Technology, Learning Styles, Instructional Methods, and Student Behavior”, Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 130–142, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1177/0273475303254004.
[4] Adam, “Using Learning Outcomes”, in Report for United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, 2004, pp. 1–2.
[5] Kieu, “Key ministerial-level project: Research to develop methods and a set of tools to evaluate the quality of general education”, Code B2003-49-45TD, 2005.
[6] T. Tam, “Factors affecting the learning outcomes of full-time students at the University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City”, Institute of Quality Assurance - Hanoi National University, 2010.
[7] University of Science and Education – The University of Danang, “Decision No. 442/QĐ-ĐHSP-ĐT issued on 31 May 2016 promulgating 'Regulations on formal training under the credit system”, 2016.
[8] University of Science and Education – The University of Danang, “Decision No. 1473 /QĐ-ĐHSP-ĐT issued on 15 Otc 2019 promulgating 'Regulations on formal training under the credit system”, 2019.
[9] R. Young, B. R. Klemz, and J. W. Murphy, “Enhancing Learning Outcomes: The Effects of Instructional Technology, Learning Styles, Instructional Methods, and Student Behavior”, Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 130–142, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1177/0273475303254004.
[10] Watson and P. Yip, “How many were there When it Mattered?: Estimating the Sizes of Crowds”, Significance, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 104–107, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00502.x.
[11] Marjoribanks, “Family Background, Family Structure and Students’ Outcomes”, Family and School Capital: Towards a Context Theory of Students’ School Outcomes, 2002, pp. 23–51. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9980-1_2.
[12] R. Pintrich, “A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts”, J Educ Psychol, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 667–686, 2003, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
[13] Bhandari, D. Chopra, and K. Singh, “Self-directed learning: assessment of students’ abilities and their perspective”, Adv Physiol Educ, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 383–386, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1152/advan.00010.2020.
[14] M. Reid, “Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire”, University of Wyoming, Department of English, Laramie, 1984.
[15] M. Quang, Theory and practice: Leadership capacity of university students. Ho Chi Minh City National University Publishing House, 2021.
[16] J. Cronbach, “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests”, Psychometrika, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–334, 1951, doi: 10.1007/BF02310555.
[17] Cristobal, C. Flavian, and M. Guinalíu, “Perceived e-service quality (PeSQ): measurement validation and effects on consumer satisfaction and web site loyalty”, Managing Service Quality, vol. 17, no. 3, Jan. 2007.
[18] C. Howard, “A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve?”, Int J Hum Comput Interact, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 51–62, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664.
[19] F. Hair, “Multivariate Data Analysis: An Overview BT - International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science”, M. Lovric, Ed., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 904–907. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_395.
[20] -M. Dufour and M. G. Dagenais, “Durbin-Watson tests for serial correlation in regressions with missing observations”, J Econom, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 371–381, 1985, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90012-0.
[21] Yuhua Qiao, Interstate Fiscal Disparities in America: A Study of Trends and Causes. New York and London: Routledge, 1999. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824153.
[22] Krämer, “Durbin–Watson Test”, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, M. Lovric, Ed., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 408–409. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_219.
[23] Trọng and C. N. M. Ngoc, Analyzing Research Data with SPSS, Volume 2. Hong Duc Publishing House, 2005.
[24] Panjei, L. Gruenwald, E. Leal, C. Nguyen, and S. Silvia, “A survey on outlier explanations”, The VLDB Journal, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 977–1008, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00778-021-00721-1.
[25] Cousineau and S. Chartier, “Outliers detection and treatment: A review”, Int J Psychol Res (Medellin), vol. 3, no. 1, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.21500/20112084.844.
[26] K. A. Pituch and J. P. Steven, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS. Routledge, 2016. doi: 10.4324/9781315814919.