A history of terminology: from standardization to cognition
Abstract: 213
|
PDF: 154
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Author
-
Hoang Anh NguyenMilitary Science Academy, Vietnam
Keywords:
Abstract
This article explores the evolution and diversification of theoretical approaches to terminology, focusing on both classical and contemporary perspectives. The study traces the development of terminology from its origins in the work of such pioneers as Eugen Wüster (Der Begriff der Terminologie und die Terminologielehre, 1953) to more recent multidimensional frameworks that incorporate social, linguistic, communicative, and cognitive dimensions. By revisiting these theories, the article highlights the growing recognition that terminology is not merely a technical endeavor but also a dynamic process shaped by social interaction and real-world applications. The paper advocates for a more holistic framework that accommodates the complexities of modern terminological practices while maintaining the essential goal of clear and precise communication in specialized fields.
References
-
[1] M. T. Cabré, “Elements for a Theory of Terminology: Towards an Alternative Paradigm”, Terminology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–57, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/term.6.1.03cab.
[2] M. S. Montero, P. Faber, and M. C. Buendía, Terminología para traductores e intérpretes (2nd ed.), Granada: Tragacanto, 2011.
[3] R. Temmerman, “Questioning the Univocity Ideal. The Difference Between Sociocognitive Terminology and Traditional Terminology”, Hermes. Journal of Linguistics, vol. 10, no. 18, pp. 51–91, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v10i18.25412
[4] M. T. Cabré, La Terminología: Teoría, Metodología y Aplicaciones, Barcelona: Empúries, 1993.
[5] M. T. Cabré, Terminology Theory, Methods and Applications, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999c.
[6] H. Felber, Terminology Manual, Paris: UNESCO and Infoterm, 1984.
[7] P. Faber, “The Cognitive Shift in Terminology and Specialized Translation”, MonTI. Monografías De Traducción e Interpretación, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 107–134, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/MonTI.2009.1.5
[8] P. Faber, “The Dynamics of Specialized Knowledge Representation: Simulational Reconstruction or the Perception-action Interface”, Terminology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 9–29, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/term.17.1.02fab
[9] L. Bowker, “Multidimensional Classification of Concepts and Terms”, in S. E. Wright and G. Budin (eds.), Handbook of Terminology Management: Basic Aspects of Terminology Management, vol. 1, pp. 133–143, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.htm1.16bow
[10] K. Kageura, “Multifaceted/Multidimensional Concept Systems”, in S. E. Wright and G. Budin (eds.), Handbook of Terminology Management: Basic Aspects of Terminology Management, vol. 1, pp. 119–132, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.htm1.15kag
[11] I. Meyer, K. Eck, and D. Skuce, “Systematic Concept Analysis Within a Knowledge-based Approach to Terminology”, in S. E. Wright and G. Budin (eds.), Handbook of Terminology Management: Basic Aspects of Terminology Management, vol. 1, pp. 98–118, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.htm1.14mey
[12] F. Gaudin, Pour une Socioterminologie: des Problèmes Sémantiques aux Pratiques Institutionnelles, Rouen: Université de Rouen, 1993.
[13] F. Gaudin, Socioterminologie: une Approche Sociolinguistique de la Terminologie, Brussels: Duculot, 2003.
[14] Y. Gambier, “Présupposés de la terminologie: vers une remise en cause”, Cahiers de linguistique sociale, vol. 18, pp. 155–176, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/013563ar
[15] M. T. Cabré, “Theories of Terminology: Their Description, Prescription and Explanation”, Terminology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 163–199, 2003.
[16] V. Evans and M. Green, Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
[17] R. Temmerman, Towards New Ways of Terminology Description, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000.
[18] R. Temmerman, “Sociocultural Situatedness of Terminology in the Life Sciences: The History of Splicing”, in J. Zlatev, T. Ziemke, R. Frank & R. Dirven (eds.), Body, Language and Mind. Vol II. Interrelations between Biology, Linguistics and Culture, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199116.3.327
[19] R. Temmerman, Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology: Explaining Terms, Concepts and Specialized Knowledge, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2022.
[20] P. Faber, A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language, Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, 2012.
[21] R. Temmerman, K. Kerremans, and V. Vandervoort, “La termontographie en contexte(s)”, in Mots, Termes et Contextes. Actes des Septièmes Journées Scientifiques du Réseau Lexicologie, Terminologie, Traduction, Daniel Blampain, Phillippe Thoiron, and Marc, 2005.
[22] P. Faber and R. Mairal, Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
[23] C. J. Fillmore, “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding”, Quaderni di Semantica, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 222–254, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.75039
[24] C. J. Fillmore, “Frame Semantics”, in Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, edited by Dirk Geeraerts, pp. 373–400, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.373
[25] I. Meyer, “Extracting Knowledge-rich Contexts for Terminography. A Conceptual and Methodological Framework”, in D. Bourigalt, C. Jacquemin, and M. C. L’Homme (eds.), Recent Advances in Computational Terminology, pp. 279–302, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.2.15mey
[26] R. D. Jr. Van Valin, The Syntax-semantics-pragmatics Interface: An Introduction to Role and Reference Grammar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[27] R. D. Jr. Van Valin and R. LaPolla, Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[28] J. Pustejovsky, The Generative Lexicon, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.

