Cộng tác giữa nhà trường và doanh nghiệp trong môi trường số: một đề xuất mô hình đa bên
Tóm tắt: 134
| 
PDF: 105 
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Author
Từ khóa:
Cộng tác nhà trường – doanh nghiệp
mô hình liên kết đa bên
chuyển đổi số
Tóm tắt
Bài báo tập trung đề xuất một mô hình cộng tác đa bên giữa nhà trường, doanh nghiệp và sinh viên/giảng viên trong bối cảnh chuyển đổi số. Dựa trên việc phân tích và đánh giá các mô hình hợp tác giữa nhà trường và doanh nghiệp trên thế giới, tác giả đề xuất một mô hình cộng tác tích hợp trong bối cảnh chuyển đổi số ở Việt Nam. Mô hình đề xuất bao gồm ba chủ thể chính: Nhà trường, Doanh nghiệp, và Sinh viên/Giảng viên, được thiết kế để vận hành theo những nguyên tắc kết nối linh hoạt, thích ứng trong môi trường số. Bài báo kết luận với các khuyến nghị về chính sách hỗ trợ cộng tác đa bên, phát triển năng lực số cho giảng viên và sinh viên, cũng như đầu tư hạ tầng công nghệ giáo dục nhằm hiện thực hóa mô hình trong bối cảnh chuyển đổi số toàn diện.
Tài liệu tham khảo
-
[1] T. T. Tran, “Graduate employability and university–enterprise collaboration in Vietnam”, Revista Lusófona de Educação, no. 45, pp. 135–150, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375788686 [Accessed: July 17, 2025].
[2] H. Nhu, “Nang chat luong nguon nhan luc”, Nguoi Lao Dong, May 14, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://nld.com.vn/nang-chat-luong-nguon-nhan-luc-196250513204802611.htm [Accessed: July 16, 2025].
[3] M. Thao, “Thi truong lam viec thay doi nhanh, sinh vien moi ra truong can chiu ap luc tot hon”, Kinh Te Sai Gon, May 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://thesaigontimes.vn/thi-truong-viec-lam-thay-doi-nhanh-sinh-vien-moi-ra-truong-can-chiu-ap-luc-tot-hon/ [Accessed: July 16, 2025].
[4] T. Q. Cuong, P. M. Hung, and P. D. Anh, “Thuc day hop tac truong dai hoc – doanh nghiep trong nghien cuu khoa hoc tai Hoc vien Ngan hang”, Tap chi Khoa hoc & Dao tao Ngan hang, no. 224 & 225, pp. 103–111, 2021.
[5] T. Tuc, “Intel da dau tu 22 trieu USD cho mot chuong trinh dao tao ky su cong nghe cao tai Viet Nam”, CafeF, June 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://cafef.vn/intel-da-dau-tu-22-trieu-usd-cho-mot-chuong-trinh-dao-tao-ky-su-cong-nghe-cao-tai-viet-nam-188240625100451133.chn [Accessed: July 17, 2025].
[6] T. Vinh, “Ra mat phong thi nghiem cong nghe o to Bosch tai Dai hoc Bach Khoa TP. HCM”, VnBusiness, April 22, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://vnbusiness.vn/cong-nghe/ra-mat-phong-thi-nghiem-cong-nghe-o-to-bosch-tai-dai-hoc-bach-khoa-tp-hcm-1084979.html [Accessed: July 12, 2025].
[7] Samsung, “Samsung day mang hop tac phat trien toan dien voi cac dai hoc khoi thy thuat tai Viet Nam giai doan 2023-3025”, Samsung Newsroom Vietnam, December 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://news.samsung.com/vn/samsung-day-manh-hop-tac-phat-trien-toan-dien-voi-cac-truong-dai-hoc-khoi-ky-thuat-tai-viet-nam-giai-doan-2023-2025 [Accessed: June 29, 2025].
[8] H. Lan, “Hoc ky doanh nghiep – buoc chay da vao thi truong lao dong”, Nguoi Lao Dong, January 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://nld.com.vn/giao-duc-khoa-hoc/hoc-ky-doanh-nghiep-buoc-chay-da-vao-thi-truong-lao-dong-20230109142312124.htm [Accessed: June 29, 2025].
[9] A. Hanelt, R. Bohnsack, D. Marz, and C. A. Marante, “A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change”, J. Manage. Stud., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1159–1197, 2021.
[10] OECD, “OECD Economic Surveys: Viet Nam 2025”, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-economic-surveys-viet-nam-2025_fb37254b-en.html [Accessed: June 12, 2025].
[11] UNESCO, Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2022.
[12] C. Dede, Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education, 1st ed. Cambridge UK: Polity Press, 2019.
[13] R. Huang et al., “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators?”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, art. 39, pp. 1–27, Dec 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.
[14] H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The Triple Helix–University–industry–government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development”, EASST Review, vol. 14, no. 1, 1995.
[15] E. Galvao et al., “Quadruple and Quintuple Helix: The evolution of Helix models for innovation”, J. Knowl. Econ., 2019.
[16] E. Carayannis and D. F. J. Campbell, “Mode 3 and Quadruple Helix: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem”, Int. J. Technol. Manage., vol. 46, no. 3–4, pp. 201–234, 2009.
[17] M. Lim and B. Y. Ong, “Communities of innovation: Leveraging collective knowledge”, International Journal of Innovation Science, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 402–418, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJIS-09-2017-0086.
[18] P. Ballon, J. Pierson, and S. Delaere, “Smart cities and living labs–Case study: Living labs as intermediaries for urban innovation”, Handbook of Smart Cities, Cham: Springer, 2009, pp. 201–219.
[19] N. Evans, A. Miklosik, and J. T. Du, “University-industry collaboration as a driver of digital transformation: Types, benefits and enablers”, Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 10, Art. no. e21017, pp. 1–12, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21017.
[20] R. Rybnicek and R. Königsgruber, “What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature”, Journal of Business Economics, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 221–250, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11573-018-0916-6.
[21] G. Bammer, “Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges”, Research Policy, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 875–887, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.004.
[22] A. McCabe, R. Parker, and S. Cox, “The ceiling to co-production in university–industry research collaboration”, Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 560–574, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1107888.
[23] M. D. Santoro and S. Gopalakrishnan, “The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–university collaborative ventures”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 17, no. 3–4, pp. 299–319, Sep. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00027-8.
[24] J. L. Simpson and D. R. Seibold, “Practical engagements and co-created research”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 266–280, 2008.
[25] D. O. Gray, P. Iles, and S. Watson, “Cross-Sector Research Collaboration in the USA: A National Innovation System Perspective”, Science and Public Policy, vol. 2, pp. 123–133, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.3152/030234211X12960315267417.
[26] M. Perkmann et al., “Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations”, Research Policy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 423–442, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
[27] M. Perkmann and K. Walsh, “Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry”, Research Policy, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1884–1891, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009.
[28] K. K. F. Yuen and A. O. M. Wong, “Designing an effective hackathon via university–industry collaboration for data science education”, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education (TALE), 2021, pp. 723–728.
[29] D. J. Cohen, “The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1013–1019, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.27151939.
[30] A. Inzelt, “The evolution of university–industry–government relationships during transition”, Research Policy, vol. 33, no. 6–7, pp. 975–995, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.002.
[31] D. Schartinger, C. Rammer, M. M. Fischer, and J. Fröhlich, “Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants”, Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 303–328, Mar. 2002.
[32] J. A. Pertuzé, E. S. Calder, E. M. Greitzer, and W. A. Lucas, “Best practices for university-industry collaboration”, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 83–90, 2010.
[33] K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business, 2017.
[34] W. A. Shewhart, Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1939.
[35] T. H. Vu and M. T. Nguyen, “Blended learning and virtual internships: Innovative models in language education in Vietnam”, Asian EFL Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2023.
[36] D. M. Nguyen and H. T. Pham, “Strengthening university–industry collaboration in Vietnam”, Vietnam Journal of Education, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 45–52, 2022.
[37] M. Almeida and J. Simões, “The role of digital transformation in the development of education ecosystems”, Journal of Innovation in Development Strategy, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2019.
[38] M. Bond et al., “Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Dec 2018, doi: 10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1.
[39] B. Minh, “Law on digital technology industry approved”, VnEconomy, June 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://vneconomy.vn/law-on-digital-technology-industry-approved.htm. [Accessed: June 25, 2025].
[40] Ministry of Science and Technology, “Government boosts investment in science and innovation with $400 million fund”, english.mst.gov.vn, March 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://english.mst.gov.vn/government-boosts-investment-in-science-and-innovation-with-400-million-fund-197250310102804408.htm. [Accessed: June 10, 2025].
Xem thêm
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Đã Xuất bản
Aug 31, 2025
Download
Cách trích dẫn
Hân, H. T. “Cộng tác giữa Nhà trường Và Doanh nghiệp Trong môi trường số: Một đề xuất Mô hình đa Bên”. Tạp Chí Khoa học Và Công nghệ - Đại học Đà Nẵng, vol 23, số p.h 8B, Tháng Tám 2025, tr 82-86, doi:10.31130/ud-jst.2025.23(8B).423.
