Reliability prediction for electrical - electronic devices: a comprehensive review of methods, challenges, and future directions
Tóm tắt: 0
|
PDF: 0
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Author
-
Kim Anh NguyenThe University of Danang – University of Science and Technology, VietnamDai HuynhThe University of Danang – University of Science and Technology, VietnamThi-Thu LeThe University of Danang – University of Science and Technology, Vietnam
Từ khóa:
Tóm tắt
Reliability prediction is fundamental to electronic system design, lifetime estimation, risk assessment, and maintenance planning. Over the past decades, diverse prediction approaches have emerged, spanning empirical handbook-based methods, physics-of-failure, life testing, state-space modeling, data-driven techniques, and hybrid frameworks. However, increasing system complexity and operating variability have revealed key limitations of empirical standards such as MIL-HDBK-217F and Telcordia SR-332, especially in physical interpretability, lifecycle coverage, and adaptability to modern applications. To address these challenges, this paper reviews and compares six representative reliability prediction models, highlighting their theoretical basis as well as their strengths and weaknesses. Particular attention is given to recent data-driven and hybrid approaches that combine physical insight with statistical learning to enhance prediction accuracy and operational relevance. From a lifecycle perspective, the paper also identifies research gaps and outlines directions toward more scalable, interpretable, and practically applicable reliability prediction frameworks for contemporary electronic systems.
Tài liệu tham khảo
-
[1] W. Denson, “The history of reliability prediction”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. SP321–SP328, 1998. Doi: 10.1109/24.740547
[2] A. K. M. Nor, S. R. Pedapati, and M. Muhammad, “Reliability engineering applications in electronic, software, nuclear and aerospace industries: A 20-year review (2000–2020)”, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 3009–3019, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.015
[3] J. Fu, S. Peyghami, A. Núñez, F. Blaabjerg, and B. D. Schutter, “A tractable failure probability prediction model for predictive maintenance scheduling of large-scale modular multilevel converters”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 6533–6544, 2023. Doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3241317
[4] X. Yu et al., “Reliability evaluation of electrical subsystem in wind turbine considering hygrothermal aging of power electronic devices”, CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, Early Access, pp. 1–10, 2024. Doi: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2022.02150
[5] J. S. Karunarathna, U. K. Madawala, F. Blaabjerg, M. Sandelic, and K. Zhang, “Reliability estimation of wired and wireless fast electric vehicle charging systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 15584–15595, 2024. Doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3441549
[6] Y. Wang, B. Yang, and J. Ma, “Bayesian prediction of aerospace system mission reliability with hierarchical and multi-fidelity test data fusion”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 267, Art. no. 111844, 2026. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111844
[7] M. Mariello, “Reliability and stability of bioelectronic medicine: A critical and pedagogical perspective”, Bioelectronic Medicine, vol. 11, Art. no. 16, 2025. Doi: 10.1186/s42234-025-00179-4
[8] J. B. Bowles, “A survey of reliability-prediction procedures for microelectronic devices”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 2–12, 1992. Doi: 10.1109/24.126662
[9] J. Jones and J. Hayes, “A comparison of electronic-reliability prediction models”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 1999. Doi: 10.1109/24.784270
[10] A. Goel and R. J. Graves, “Electronic system reliability: Collating prediction models”, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 258–265, 2006. Doi: 10.1109/TDMR.2006.876570
[11] J. G. McLeish, “Enhancing MIL-HDBK-217 reliability predictions with physics-of-failure methods”, in 2010 Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), San Jose, CA, USA, 2010. Doi: 10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448044
[12] A. B. Temsamani, S. Kauffmann, Y. Descas, B. Vandevelde, F. Zanon, and G. Willems, “Improved and accurate physics-of-failure (PoF) methodology for qualification and lifetime assessment of electronic systems”, Microelectronics Reliability, vols. 76–77, pp. 42–46, 2017. Doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2017.06.047
[13] M. G. Pecht and F. R. Nash, “Predicting the reliability of electronic equipment”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 992–1004, 1994. Doi: 10.1109/5.293157
[14] N. G. N. Irias, F. A. L. Souza, H. de Paula, and L. A. R. Silva, “Challenges in using the physics-of-failure approach in practical applications”, in 2017 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2017. Doi: 10.1109/IAS.2017.8101838
[15] K. Ma, H. Wang, and F. Blaabjerg, “New approaches to reliability assessment: Using physics-of-failure for prediction and design in power electronics systems”, IEEE Power Electronics Magazine, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 28–41, 2016. Doi: 10.1109/MPEL.2016.2615277
[16] A. Hanif, Y. Yu, D. D. Voto, and F. Khan, “A comprehensive review toward the state-of-the-art in failure and lifetime predictions of power electronic devices”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 4729–4746, 2019. Doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2860587
[17] H. Wang and F. Blaabjerg, “Power electronics reliability: State of the art and outlook”, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 6476–6493, 2021. Doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2020.3037161
[18] F. O. Ehiagwina et al., “A comparative overview of electronic devices reliability prediction methods: Applications and trends”, Majlesi Journal of Telecommunication Devices, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 129–137, 2017
[19] V. Kumar, L. K. Singh, and A. K. Tripathi, “Reliability prediction methods for electronic devices: A state-of-the-art review”, IETE Technical Review, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 460–470, 2020. Doi: 10.1080/02564602.2020.1843552
[20] Z. Xu and J. H. Saleh, “Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 211, Art. no. 107530, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107530
[21] H. Li, Z. Zhang, T. Li, and X. Si, “A review on physics-informed data-driven remaining useful life prediction: Challenges and opportunities”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 209, Art. no. 111120, 2024. Doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111120
[22] K. Gaurav, V. Kumar, and B. K. Singh, “Dependability analysis of a system using state-space modeling techniques: A systematic review”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 1340–1354, 2023. Doi: 10.1109/TR.2023.3289920
[23] F. E. Indmeskine, L. Saintis, and A. Kobi, “Review on accelerated life testing plan to develop predictive reliability models for electronic components based on design-of-experiments”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 2594–2607, 2023. Doi: 10.1002/qre.3330
[24] D. J. Navamani et al., “Reliability prediction and assessment models for power components: A comparative analysis”, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 30, pp. 497–520, 2023. Doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09806-8
[25] B. Foucher, J. Boullie, B. Meslet, and D. Das, “A review of reliability prediction methods for electronic devices”, Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1155–1162, 2002. Doi: 10.1016/S0026-2714(02)00087-2
[26] D. J. Smith, Reliability, Maintainability and Risk: Practical Methods for Engineers, 10th ed. Oxford, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier, 2022. Doi: 10.1016/C2021-0-00257-1
[27] T. Jónás, G. Árva, and Z. E. Tóth, “Forecasting failure rates of electronic goods by using decomposition and fuzzy clustering of empirical failure rate curves,” Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2018. Doi: 10.3311/PPso.9026
[28] X. Pan, H. Wang, W. You, M. Zhang, and Y. Yang, “Assessing the reliability of electronic products using customer knowledge discovery,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 199, Art. no. 106925, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106925
[29] HDBK-217Plus™:2015, Notice 1, Quanterion Solutions Incorporated, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.quanterion.com/product/publications/hdbk-217plus-2015-notice-1/ [Accessed: May 11, 2025].
[30] Reliability Prediction Procedure for Electronic Equipment, SR-332, Issue 4, Telcordia Technologies, 2016.
[31] FIDES Guide 2022: Reliability Methodology for Electronic Systems, FIDES Group, 2023.
[32] Electric Components – Reliability – Reference Conditions for Failure Rates and Stress Models for Conversion, IEC 61709, International Electrotechnical Commission, 2017.
[33] Reliability Data Handbook—Universal Model for Reliability Prediction of Electronic Components, PCBs and Equipment, IEC TR 62380, IEC Technical Committee, 2004.
[34] 217Plus™:2015 Calculator, Quanterion Solutions Incorporated, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.quanterion.com/products-services/tools/217plus/ [Accessed: May 11, 2025].
[35] A. Peter, D. Das, and M. Pecht, “Appendix D: Critique of MIL-HDBK-217,” in Reliability Growth: Enhancing Defense System Reliability, Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press, 2015, pp. 203–246.
[36] A. Gaonkar, R. B. Patil, D. Das, M. H. Azarian, B. Sood, and M. G. Pecht, “Assessment of the FIDES Guide 2022 electrical, electronic, and electromechanical reliability prediction methodology,” e-Prime – Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, vol. 6, Art. no. 100353, 2023. Doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2023.100353
[37] D. Butnicu, “A review of failure rate calculation’s differences due to package for IEC TR 62380 vs. other prediction standards,” in 2021 IEEE 27th International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME), Timisoara, Romania, 2022. Doi: 10.1109/SIITME53254.2021.9663584
[38] M. Held and K. Fritz, “Comparison and evaluation of newest failure rate prediction models: FIDES and RIAC 217Plus,” Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 49, nos. 9–11, pp. 967–971, 2009. Doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2009.07.031
[39] M. Modarres, “Probabilistic physics of failure concept and its application in reliability engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 19–20, 2024. Doi: 10.1109/TR.2024.3357811
[40] Z. Zeng, R. Kang, and Y. Chen, “Using PoF models to predict system reliability considering failure collaboration,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1294–1301, 2016. Doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2016.08.014
[41] B. Sun, X. Fan, J. Fan, C. Qian, and G. Q. Zhang, “A PoF and statistics combined reliability prediction for LED arrays in lamps,” in 2017 18th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE), Dresden, Germany, 2017. Doi: 10.1109/EuroSimE.2017.7926264
[42] Q. Li, Y. Li, G. Pan, J. W. Zhu, B. Lei, and X. Li, “A PoF-based reliability assessment framework for complex systems,” in 2018 12th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability, and Safety (ICRMS), Shanghai, China, 2018. Doi: 10.1109/ICRMS.2018.00084
[43] R. Smith and M. Modarres, “A physics-of-failure approach to common cause failure considering component degradation,” in 2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), Palm Springs, CA, USA, 2020. Doi: 10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153651
[44] C. Song, Z. Tang, Z. Sun, C. Qian, and B. Sun, “Reliability analysis of printed circuit boards based on a physics-of-failure simulation method,” in 2020 17th China International Forum on Solid State Lighting & 2020 International Forum on Wide Bandgap Semiconductors China (SSLChina: IFWS), Shenzhen, China, 2020. Doi: 10.1109/SSLChinaIFWS51786.2020.9308849
[45] C. Nawghane, B. Vandevelde, R. Labie, S. Michiels, D. Hughes, and M. Liu, “A PoF-based methodology to assess the reliability of a sensor module operating in harsh industrial environments,” in 2022 23rd International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE), St Julian, Malta, 2022. Doi: 10.1109/EuroSimE54907.2022.9758839
[46] Z. Guo, H. Chen, Y. Hu, and J. Jiang, “Reliability prediction of electronic components based on physics of failure with manufacturing parameter fluctuations,” Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 168, Art. no. 115662, 2025. Doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2025.115662
[47] S. V. Angadi et al., “Reliability and life study of hydraulic solenoid valve. Part 1: A multi-physics finite element model,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 874–887, 2009. Doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.08.011
[48] X. Wang et al., “Refined sub-region nanoindentation and FEM modeling of solvent-modified sintered silver joints for enhanced reliability prediction in power electronics,” Materials & Design, vol. 259, Art. no. 114716, 2025. Doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114716
[49] W. H. Chen, L. Gao, J. Pan, P. Qian, and Q. C. He, “Design of accelerated life test plans—Overview and prospect,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 31, Art. no. 13, 2018. Doi: 10.1186/s10033-018-0206-9
[50] M. H. Ling, “Optimal designs of multiple step-stress accelerated life tests for one-shot devices with Weibull lifetime distributions,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 3017–3027, 2025. Doi: 10.1109/TR.2024.3480969
[51] M. M. A. Almazah et al., “Estimation of parameters for the modified Weibull distribution under step-stress accelerated life testing with application to aircraft windshields data,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, 2025, Art. no. 25137. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95469-x.
[52] T. Oketch and M. Sepehrifar, “Modeling complex life systems: Bayesian inference for Weibull failure times using adaptive MCMC,” Statistical Papers, vol. 67, 2026, Art. no. 2. Doi: 10.1007/s00362-025-01781-z
[53] K. Moustafa, Z. Hu, Z. P. Mourelatos, I. Baseski, and M. Majcher, “System reliability analysis using component-level and system-level accelerated life testing,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 214, 2021, Art. no. 107755. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107755
[54] S. Distefano and K. S. Trivedi, “Non-Markovian state-space models in dependability evaluation,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 225–239, 2013. Doi: 10.1002/qre.1305
[55] N. Li, N. Gebraeel, Y. Lei, L. Bian, and X. Si, “Remaining useful life prediction of machinery under time-varying operating conditions based on a two-factor state-space model,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 186, pp. 88–100, 2019. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.017
[56] M. S. Arulampalam, S. Maskell, N. Gordon, and T. Clapp, “A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 174–188, 2002. Doi: 10.1109/78.978374
[57] D. Frizzo, F. Borsatti, and G. A. Susto, “A quantile regression approach for remaining useful life estimation with state space models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17018, 2025. Doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.17018
[58] A. Aushev, T. Tran, H. Pesonen, A. Howes, and S. Kaski, “Likelihood-free inference in state-space models with unknown dynamics,” Statistics and Computing, vol. 34, 2024, Art. no. 27. Doi: 10.1007/s11222-023-10339-8
[59] D. Henderson and G. Lunter, “Efficient inference in state-space models through adaptive learning in online Monte Carlo expectation maximization,” Computational Statistics, vol. 35, pp. 1319–1344, 2020. Doi: 10.1007/s00180-019-00937-4
[60] J. Yang, H. Zhang, L. Li, and Q. Miao, “IGBT modules fault prediction based on particle filter with an improved nonlinear characteristics representation of state-space model,” Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 139, 2022, Art. no. 114795. Doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2022.114795
[61] Z. Hu, C. Hu, Z. P. Mourelatos, and S. Mahadevan, “Model discrepancy quantification in simulation-based design of dynamical systems,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 141, no. 1, 2019, Art. no. 011401. Doi: 10.1115/1.4041483.
[62] J. Long, C. Chen, Z. Liu, J. Guo, and W. Chen, “Stochastic hybrid system approach to task-orientated remaining useful life prediction under time-varying operating conditions,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 225, 2022, Art. no. 108568. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108568
[63] V. Shaj, D. Buchler, R. Sonker, P. Becker, and G. Neumann, “Hidden parameter recurrent state space models for changing dynamics scenarios,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14697, 2022. Doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2206.14697
[64] R. He, Z. Tian, and M. Zuo, “Machine prognostics under varying operating conditions based on state-space and neural network modeling,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 182, 2023, Art. no. 109598. Doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109598
[65] J. Friederich and S. Lazarova-Molnar, “Towards data-driven reliability modeling for cyber-physical production systems,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 184, pp. 589–596, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.073
[66] B. Sekeroglu, Y. K. Ever, K. Dimililer, and F. Al-Turjman, “Comparative evaluation and comprehensive analysis of machine learning models for regression problems,” Data Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 620–652, 2022. Doi: 10.1162/dint_a_00155
[67] G. Sarazin, J. Morio, A. Lagnoux, M. Balesdent, and L. Brevault, “Reliability-oriented sensitivity analysis in presence of data-driven epistemic uncertainty,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 215, 2021, Art. no. 107733. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107733
[68] F. Oliveira, D. G. Costa, F. Assis, and I. Silva, “Internet of intelligent things: A convergence of embedded systems, edge computing and machine learning,” Internet of Things, vol. 26, 2024, Art. no. 101153. Doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2024.101153
[69] C. Li, S. Li, Y. Feng, K. Gryllias, F. Gu, and M. Pecht, “Small data challenges for intelligent prognostics and health management: A review,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, 2024, Art. no. 214. Doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-10820-4
[70] E. Chen, H. Bao, and N. Dinh, “Evaluating the reliability of machine-learning-based predictions used in nuclear power plant instrumentation and control systems,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 250, 2024, Art. no. 110266. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110266
[71] D. H. Huang, C. H. Huang, and Y. K. Lin, “Deep learning-driven reliability modeling for preventive maintenance in a multi-state hybrid flow shop,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 68, 2025, Art. no. 103707. Doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2025.103707
[72] M. Mikhail, M. S. Ouali, and S. Yacout, “A data-driven methodology with a nonparametric reliability method for optimal condition-based maintenance strategies,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 241, 2024, Art. no. 109668. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109668
[73] F. Balali, H. Seifoddini, and A. Nasiri, “Data-driven predictive model of reliability estimation using degradation models: A review,” Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 113–125, 2020. Doi: 10.1007/s41872-020-00111-6
[74] T. Zhou, E. L. Droguett, and A. Mosleh, “Physics-informed deep learning: A promising technique for system reliability assessment,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 126, 2022, Art. no. 109217. Doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109217
[75] J. Watson et al., “Machine learning with physics knowledge for prediction: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09840, 2024. Doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.09840
[76] H. V. Tran, K. A. Nguyen, and D. D. Le, “Enhancing power transformer insulation assessment using gradient boosted decision trees and 2-FAL analysis,” The University of Danang - Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 23, no. 9B, pp. 49–55, 2025. Doi: 10.31130/ud-jst.2025.23(9B).503E
[77] K. A. Nguyen, H. H. Le, B. T. Phung, and H. V. Tran, “A fuzzy logic approach combined with IEC and Roger methods for power transformer fault diagnosis based on DGA,” The University of Danang - Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 23, no. 5A, pp. 64–70, 2025. Doi: 10.31130/ud-jst.2025.010
[78] K. A. Nguyen, D. T. H. Do, H. K. Trinh, N. K. Nguyen, and N. B. Doan, “Machine learning-based estimation of power output in solar photovoltaic systems under real-world conditions,” The University of Danang - Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 23, no. 9D, pp. 79–85, 2025. Doi: 10.31130/ud-jst.2025.23(9D).569E
[79] M. Núñez-Merino, J. M. Maqueira-Marín, J. Moyano-Fuentes, and C. A. Castano-Moraga, “Quantum-inspired computing technology in operations and logistics management,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 247–274, 2024. Doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2023-0065
[80] P. Lamichhane and D. B. Rawat, “Quantum machine learning: Recent advances, challenges and perspectives,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 94057–94105, 2025. Doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3573244
[81] J. Ploennigs, K. Smarsly, M. Berger, K. Dragos, and M. Kliesch, “Quantum and quantum-inspired computing in civil engineering,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 69, Art. no. 103960, 2026. Doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2025.103960
[82] H. H. Le, B. T. Phung, D. Huynh, and K.-A. Nguyen, “Transformer fault diagnosis using an efficient simulation-driven variational quantum classifier with domain-aware feature encoding,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 144, pp. 58–78, 2026. Doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2026.04.032
[83] P. Bansal et al., “Physics-informed machine learning assisted uncertainty quantification for the corrosion of dissimilar material joints,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 227, Art. no. 108711, 2022. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108711
[84] L. Liao and F. Köttig, “A hybrid framework combining data-driven and model-based methods for system remaining useful life prediction,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 44, pp. 191–199, 2016. Doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.03.013
[85] J. Willard, X. Jia, S. Xu, M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar, “Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and environmental systems,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 4, Art. no. 66, pp. 1–37, 2022. Doi: 10.1145/3514228
[86] M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
[87] Y. A. Yucesan and F. A. C. Viana, “Hybrid physics-informed neural networks for main bearing fatigue prognosis with visual grease inspection,” Computers in Industry, vol. 125, Art. no. 103386, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103386
[88] F. Mei, H. Chen, W. Yang, and G. Zhai, “A hybrid physics-informed machine learning approach for time-dependent reliability assessment of electromagnetic relays,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 252, Art. no. 110385, 2024. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110385
[89] Y. Xu, P. Bansal, P. Wang, and Y. Li, “Physics-informed machine learning for system reliability analysis and design with partially observed information,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 254, Art. no. 110598, 2025. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110598
[90] R. G. Nascimento, F. A. C. Viana, M. Corbetta, and C. S. Kulkarni, “A framework for Li-ion battery prognosis based on hybrid Bayesian physics-informed neural networks,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, Art. no. 13856, 2023. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33018-0
[91] S. Zhao, C. Jiang, Z. Zhang, and X. Long, “Robust remaining useful life estimation based on an improved unscented Kalman filtering method,” Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 1151–1173, 2020. Doi: 10.32604/cmes.2020.08867
[92] W. Luo, T. Hu, Y. Ye, C. Zhang, and Y. Wei, “A hybrid predictive maintenance approach for CNC machine tool driven by digital twin,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 65, Art. no. 101974, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2020.101974
[93] Y. Ye, Q. Yang, J. Zhang, S. Meng, and J. Wang, “A dynamic data-driven reliability prognosis method for structural digital twin and experimental validation,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 240, Art. no. 109543, 2023. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109543
[94] H. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Mu, J. Xiang, and J. Li, “Real-time precision reliability prediction for the worm drive system supported by digital twins,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 240, Art. no. 109589, 2023. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109589
[95] D. D’Urso, F. Chiacchio, S. Cavalieri, S. Gambadoro, and S. M. Khodayee, “Predictive maintenance of standalone steel industrial components powered by a dynamic reliability digital twin model with artificial intelligence,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 243, Art. no. 109859, 2024. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109859
[96] M. Achouch et al., “On predictive maintenance in industry 4.0: Overview, models, and challenges,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 16, Art. no. 8081, 2022. Doi: 10.3390/app12168081
[97] G. E. Karniadakis, I. G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, and L. Yang, “Physics-informed machine learning,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 422–440, 2021. Doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5
[98] L. Zhang and X. Gao, “Transfer adaptation learning: A decade survey,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 23–44, 2024. Doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3183326
[99] M. Soori, B. Arezoo, and R. Dastres, “Digital twin for smart manufacturing: A review,” Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, vol. 2, Art. no. 100017, 2023. Doi: 10.1016/j.smse.2023.100017
[100] I. Errandonea, S. Beltrán, and S. Arrizabalaga, “Digital twin for maintenance: A literature review,” Computers in Industry, vol. 123, Art. no. 103316, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103316
[101] D. Jones, C. Snider, A. Nassehi, J. Yon, and B. Hicks, “Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 29, pp. 36–52, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002
[102] C. Semeraro, M. Lezoche, H. Panetto, and M. Dassisti, “Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review,” Computers in Industry, vol. 130, Art. no. 103469, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469
[103] M. Aien, A. Hajebrahimi, and M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, “A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 57, pp. 1077–1089, 2016. Doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.070
[104] Y. Hu, X. Miao, Y. Si, E. Pan, and E. Zio, “Prognostics and health management: A review from the perspectives of design, development and decision,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 217, Art. no. 108063, 2022. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108063
[105] M. L. Rebaiaia and D. Ait-Kadi, “A remaining useful life model for optimizing maintenance cost and spare-parts replacement of production systems in the context of sustainability,” in Proc. 10th IFAC Conf. Manuf. Model., Manag. and Control (MIM 2022), Nantes, France, 2022, IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1562–1568. Doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.613
[106] Y. Gal and Z. Ghahramani, "Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning," in Proc. 33rd Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML 2016), New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2016, pp. 1050–1059
[107] B. Lakshminarayanan, A. Pritzel, and C. Blundell, "Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 30, Long Beach, CA, USA, Dec. 2017, pp. 6402–6413
[108] L. Basora, A. Viens, M. A. Chao, and X. Olive, "A benchmark on uncertainty quantification for deep learning prognostics," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 253, Art. no. 110513, 2025. Doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110513
[109] A. N. Angelopoulos and S. Bates, "Conformal prediction: A gentle introduction," Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 494–591, 2023. Doi: 10.1561/2200000101

