Điều chỉnh trong quan hệ Hoa Kỳ - Nato dưới thời chính quyền Donald Trump 2.0 so với chính quyền Joe Biden
Tóm tắt: 0
| 
PDF: 0 
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Author
Từ khóa:
Hoa Kỳ
NATO
quan hệ Hoa Kỳ - NATO
chính quyền Donald Trump 2.0
chính quyền Joe Biden
Tóm tắt
Kể từ khi thành lập vào năm 1949, Tổ chức Hiệp ước Bắc Đại Tây Dương (NATO) luôn duy trì sự gắn kết chặt chẽ dưới vai trò lãnh đạo của Hoa Kỳ. Dưới thời chính quyền Joe Biden (2021 - 2025), quan hệ Hoa Kỳ - NATO đã có những tiến triển đáng kể, phản ánh cách tiếp cận đa phương và cam kết của Washington trong việc hỗ trợ các đồng minh xuyên Đại Tây Dương. Tuy nhiên, sau khi trở lại Nhà Trắng, chính quyền Donald Trump 2.0 đã chuyển hướng quan hệ Hoa Kỳ - NATO sang cách tiếp cận thực dụng và mang tính giao dịch hơn. Trên cơ sở khái quát quan hệ Hoa Kỳ - NATO dưới thời chính quyền Joe Biden, bài viết tập trung làm rõ các yếu tố tác động đến sự điều chỉnh và thực tiễn điều chỉnh trong quan hệ Hoa Kỳ - NATO giai đoạn đầu nhiệm kỳ Donald Trump 2.0. Từ đó, bài viết đánh giá tác động của sự điều chỉnh này và đưa ra một số dự báo về chiều hướng quan hệ Hoa Kỳ - NATO đến hết nhiệm kỳ Donald Trump 2.0.
Tài liệu tham khảo
-
[1] NATO, “A short history of NATO”, NATO, n.d. [Online]. Available: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/nato-history/a-short-history-of-nato. [Accessed February 4, 2026].
[2] A. Wieslander, E. Adamson and J. Lehto, “Securing Northern Europe within NATO”, Atlantic Council, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Securing-Northern-Europe-within-NATO.pdf. [Accessed February 5, 2026].
[3] The White House, “Biden-Harris Administration’s National Security Strategy”, The White House, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf. [Accessed February 5, 2026].
[4] The White House, “Indo-Pacific Strategy of The United States”, The White House, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf. [Accessed March 27, 2026].
[5] U.S. Mission to NATO, “NATO Summit: President Biden at a Public Event at Vilnius University”, U.S. Mission to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://nato.usmission.gov/nato-summit-remarks-by-president-biden-on-supporting-ukraine-defending-democratic-values-and-taking-action-to-address-global-challenges/. [Accessed February 7, 2026].
[6] U.S. Department of Defense, “Russia war in Ukraine: Timeline”, www.defense.gov, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.defense.gov/Spotlights/Support-for-Ukraine/Timeline/. [Accessed February 7, 2026].
[7] Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, “U.S. Security Cooperation with Ukraine”, U.S. Department of State, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.state.gov/bureau-of-political-military-affairs/releases/2025/01/u-s-security-cooperation-with-ukraine. [Accessed February 7, 2026].
[8] C. Stamegna and L. Boehm, “Russia’s war on Ukraine: Cutting certain Russian banks off from SWIFT”, European Parliamentary Research Service, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2022/729289/EPRS_ATA(2022)729289_EN.pdf. [Accessed February 8, 2026].
[9] C. Welt, P. Belkin, A. S. Bowen and R. M. Nelson, “Russia’s War on Ukraine: U.S. Policy and the Role of Congress”, Congressional Research Service, U.S., IF12277, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12277. [Accessed February 9, 2026].
[10] C. Welt, “Ukraine: Background, Conflict with Russia, and U.S. Policy”, Congressional Research Service, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45008. [Accessed February 9, 2026].
[11] NATO, “Relations with Ukraine”, NATO, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/partnerships-and-cooperation/relations-with-ukraine. [Accessed February 10, 2026].
[12] C. L. Arabia, A. S. Bowen and C. Welt, “U.S. Security Assistance to Ukraine”, Congressional Research Service, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12040. [Accessed February 10, 2026].
[13] H. A. Tuan, “America under Donald Trump 2.0: ‘The comprehensive revolution’ and the restructuring of global power”, Baoquocte.vn, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://baoquocte.vn/nuoc-my-duoi-thoi-donald-trump-20-cuoc-cach-mang-toan-dien-va-cong-cuoc-tai-cau-truc-quyen-luc-toan-cau-304495.html. [Accessed February 12, 2026].
[14] The White House, “National Security Strategy of the United States of America”, The White House, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf. [Accessed February 12, 2026].
[15] H. A. Tuan, “Why did the United States under President Trump 2.0 focus on manufacturing?”, Vietmy.net.vn, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://en.vietmy.net.vn/tai-sao-nuoc-my-duoi-thoi-tong-thong-trump-2-0-tap-trung-vao-nganh-san-xuat-manufacturing-DE02A7A73.html. [Accessed February 12, 2026].
[16] M. Bergmann, “The Transatlantic Alliance in the Age of Trump: The Coming Collisions”, Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep67564?seq=1. [Accessed February 17, 2026].
[17] G. Spatafora, “Keeping EU-NATO cooperation alive under Trump 2.0”, European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/commentary/keeping-eu-nato-cooperation-alive-under-trump-20. [Accessed February 17, 2026].
[18] N. Mi, “U.S. - EU - NATO relations under the Trump 2.0 administration”, Ordi.vn, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ordi.vn/binh-luan/quan-he-my-eu-nato-duoi-thoi-chinh-quyen-trump-2-0. [Accessed February 19, 2026].
[19] P. Szymański, “NATO summit in The Hague: Trump’s return and a two-component 5% of GDP on defence”, OSW Centre for Eastern Studies, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2025-06-26/nato-summit-hague-trumps-return-and-a-two-component-5-gdp [Accessed February 20, 2026].
[20] NATO, “Defense Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014-2025)”, NATO, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/webready/documents/finance/def-exp-2025-en.pdf. [Accessed February 20, 2026].
[21] C. S. Hendrix, “Trump’s Five Percent Doctrine and NATO Defense Spending”, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2025/trumps-five-percent-doctrine-and-nato-defense-spending. [Accessed February 20, 2026].
[22] R. Pszczel, “The new US policy forcing Europe into greater self-reliance in defence: accepting imperfection but not failure”, Real Instituto Elcano, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/analyses/the-new-us-policy-forcing-europe-into-greater-self-reliance-in-defence-accepting-imperfection-but-not-failure/. [Accessed February 20, 2026].
[23] O. Lungescu, “US Troop Cuts on NATO’s Eastern Flank”, Royal United Services Institute, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/us-troop-cuts-natos-eastern-flank. [Accessed February 20, 2026].
[24] The Guardian, “Trump does deal with NATO allies to arm Ukraine and warns Russia of severe sanctions”, The Guardian, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/14/trump-does-deal-with-nato-allies-to-arm-ukraine-and-warns-russia-of-severe-sanctions. [Accessed February 20, 2026].
[25] S. Lehne, “What Can the EU Do About Trump 2.0?”, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2026/02/what-can-the-eu-do-about-trump-20. [Accessed February 20, 2026].
[26] L. Habedank, R. Loss and K. Westgaard, “Look what you made us do: How to realise a European-led NATO”, European Council on Foreign Relations, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ecfr.eu/article/look-what-you-made-us-do-how-to-realise-a-european-led-nato/. [Accessed February 21, 2026].
[27] C. Belin and M. Ruge, “Why Trump’s National Security Strategy is a geoeconomic trap for Europe”, European Council on Foreign Relations, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ecfr.eu/article/why-trumps-national-security-strategy-is-a-geoeconomic-trap-for-europe/. [Accessed February 21, 2026].
[28] R. Tausendfreund and R. Kefferpütz, “Trump 2.0 and European cohesion – Scenario implications for Ukraine and transatlantic security”, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/2024-12/e-paper_trump_2.0_and_european_cohesion_2.pdf.
[29] L. von Daniels, C. Major and N. von Ondarza, “How Europe is preparing for Trump II”, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/arbeitspapiere/European_Perspectives_on_Trump_II_WP_von_Daniels_Major_von_Ondarza.pdf. [Accessed February 22, 2026].
[30] A. Matlé, “Burden Sharing Revisited: How to Keep the United States Engaged in Europe’s Security”, German Council on Foreign Relations, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dgap.org/system/files/article_pdfs/DGAP-Policy-Brief-04-2024-EN_1.pdf. [Accessed February 22, 2026].
[31] L. Retter et al., “European Strategic Autonomy in Defence: Transatlantic visions and implications for NATO, US and EU relations”, RAND Corporation, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1319-1.html. [Accessed February 23, 2026].
[32] C. S. Chivvis and E. Ratner, “Would an Asian NATO Be Good for America?”, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://carnegieendowment.org/podcasts/pivotal-states-podcast/would-an-asian-nato-be-good-for-america. [Accessed February 23, 2026].
[33] K. Raik, “EU defence facing Russia: Eastern European security after the invasion of Ukraine”, European Council on Foreign Relations, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ecfr.eu/article/democratic-defence-eastern-european-security-after-the-invasion-of-ukraine/. [Accessed February 23, 2026].
[34] G. Martin and V. Sinkkonen, “Four scenarios for the future of transatlantic relations: European autonomy and the American challenge”, fiia.fi, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/BP415_Four-scenarios-for-the-future-of-transatlantic-relations_v2.pdf. [Accessed February 23, 2026].
[35] G. Spatafora, “Fit for purpose? Reforming NATO in the age of Trump 2.0”, iss.europa.eu, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/briefs/fit-purpose-reforming-nato-age-trump-20. [Accessed February 23, 2026].
[36] C. Belin, M. Ruge, and J. Shapiro, “Imagining Trump 2.0: Six scary policy scenarios for a second term”, European Council on Foreign Relations, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ecfr.eu/publication/imagining-trump-2-0-six-scary-policy-scenarios-for-a-second-term/. [Accessed February 23, 2026].
Xem thêm
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Đã Xuất bản
May 11, 2026
Download
Cách trích dẫn
Toàn, P. M., và T. T. Thu. “Điều chỉnh Trong Quan hệ Hoa Kỳ - Nato dưới thời chính quyền Donald Trump 2.0 so với chính quyền Joe Biden”. Tạp Chí Khoa học Và Công nghệ Đại học Đà Nẵng, vol 24, số p.h 5B, Tháng Năm 2026, tr 36-43, doi:10.31130/ud-jst.2026.24(5B).269.
