Tác tử tình thái trong diên ngôn thiên tai: tiếp cận từ khối liệu báo chí vương quốc Anh
Tóm tắt: 0
|
PDF: 1
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Author
-
Phan Tuan LyHo Chi Minh City University of Law, VietnamKieu Minh KhanhUniversity of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamPham Thi Thuy DungHo Chi Minh City University of Law, Vietnam; University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Từ khóa:
Tóm tắt
Bài viết nghiên cứu việc sử dụng các tác tử tình thái will/would, can/could và may/might trong diễn ngôn thiên tai trên báo chí Vương quốc Anh. Thông qua phân tích 70 văn bản từ 7 cơ quan báo chí lớn, nghiên cứu làm rõ cách thức vận hành của các tác tử này trên phương diện ngữ nghĩa và ngữ dụng. Kết quả cho thấy will/would thể hiện dự báo tương lai với các mức độ cam kết khác nhau; can/could dung hòa giữa khả năng khách quan và nhận định báo chí; còn may/might biểu thị các mức độ khả thi khác nhau, trong đó might đóng vai trò là công cụ giảm nhẹ độ khẳng định trong ngữ cảnh cứu trợ. Về mặt định lượng, trợ động từ tình thái chiếm ưu thế trong ngữ liệu (63.6%), trong khi tình thái đạo nghĩa chiếm 25.9%. Nhìn chung, nghiên cứu nhấn mạnh vai trò cốt lõi của tình thái trong việc định hình cách thức truyền tải tin tức về thảm họa.
Tài liệu tham khảo
-
[1] J. K. Van Leuven and M. D. Slater, “How publics, public relations, and the media shape the public opinion process,” Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. 3, no. 1–4, pp. 165–178, 1991, doi: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_8.
[2] C. H. Liao, “Exploring the influence of public perception of mass media usage and attitudes towards mass media news on altruistic behavior,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 621, 2023, doi: 10.3390/bs13080621.
[3] T. A. Van Dijk, “Discourse analysis: Its development and application to the structure of news,” Journal of Communication, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 20–43, 1983, doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02386.x.
[4] R. Morante and C. Sporleder, “Modality and negation: An introduction to the special issue,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 223–260, 2012, doi: 10.1162/COLI_a_00095.
[5] E. S. Balandina and M. F. Al-Abboodi, “Linguistic representation of natural disasters in media coverage,” Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 30–35, 2020.
[6] M. A. G. Bacolod, “On the translatability of Filipino modals and its impact on disaster communication,” in Translation Studies in the Philippines, M. A. G. Bacolod, Ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2023, pp. 116–134.
[7] R. Zhai and J. Liu, “The interpersonal meanings of modality in micro-blogging English news discourse: The case of ‘Donald Trump’s Muslim entry ban’,” Advances in Language and Literary Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 110–114, 2018.
[8] A. Mukhtarullina, S. Issakova, G. Alimbek, and A. Issakova, “The pragmatic aspect of modality in English mass-media discourse,” World Journal of English Language, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 322–330, 2024.
[9] G. A. Tanirverdiyeva, “Modality as a marker of information structure in news discourse,” Master’s thesis, Khazar Univ., Baku, Azerbaijan, 2025.
[10] W. Wu and J. Wang, “A study on the modality of climate news discourse: The case of The New York Times,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 13, Art. no. 102582, 2026.
[11] P. T. Ly, H. N. T. Truc, and K. M. Khanh, “Modality in news discourse on natural disasters: A study of the United Kingdom press,” Thu Dau Mot University Journal of Science, pp. 1–20, 2026.
[12] T. A. Sebeok, Ed., Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, vol. 1, A–M. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, 1986.
[13] M. A. K. Halliday, An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London, U.K.: Edward Arnold, 1994.
[14] F. Palmer, Mood and Modality. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[15] A. Hakulinen and F. Karlsson, Nykysuomen Lauseoppia (Sentence Grammar of Contemporary Finnish). Jyväskylä, Finland, 1979.
[16] F. R. Palmer, Mood and Modality, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[17] J. Cervoni, L’énonciation. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France, 1987.
[18] N. Gisborne, “Dynamic modality,” SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 44–61, 2007.
[19] J. Nuyts, “Modality: Overview and linguistic issues,” in The Expression of Modality, W. Frawley, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008, pp. 1–29.
[20] R. Huddleston and G. K. Pullum, The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[21] E. Jędrzejko, Semantyka i składnia polskich czasowników deontycznych. Wrocław, Poland: Ossolineum, 1987.
[22] A. Matulewska, “Deontic modality and modals in the language of contracts,” Comparative Legilinguistics: International Journal for Legal Communication, vol. 2, pp. 75–92, 2010.
[23] J. Lyons, Semantics, vols. 1–2. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
[24] L. Hoye, Adverbs and Modality in English. London, U.K.: Longman, 1997.
[25] T. Li and X. Zhen, “A Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis of the American and British Media Reports on the Discharge of Water from Fukushima,” Journal of Global Trends in Social Science, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1–12, 2025.
[26] I. Nurhamidah, R. Santosa, D. Djatmika, and H. Yustanto, “The use of UAM-CorpusTool for a more comprehensive text analysis,” in International Seminar SEMANTIKS & PRASASTI 2023: Language in the Workplace, Surakarta, Indonesia, Dec. 2023, Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2023, pp. 170–176.
[27] G. Griffin, “Discourse analysis,” Research Methods for English Studies, vol. 2, pp. 93–112, 2013.
[28] V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, and R. H. Jones, “Approaches to discourse analysis,” in Advances in Discourse Studies, V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, and R. H. Jones, Eds. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2008, pp. 11–28.
[29] P. T. T. Dung, H. N. T. Truc, and P. T. Ly, “A Comparative Study of Interpersonal Meaning in Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Metadiscourse Theory,” The University of Danang - Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 83–89, 2026, doi: 10.31130/ud-jst.2026.24(2).583.
[30] A. Bonyadi, “Linguistic manifestations of modality in newspaper editorials,” International Journal of Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no. E30, 2011.
[31] F. Seggewiß, “Current changes in the English modals – a corpus-based analysis of present-day spoken English,” Ph.D. dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 2012. [Online]. Available: FreiDok plus.
[32] P. Z. B. Megat Khalid, “Modality analysis of the newspaper articles about the Scottish ship RMS Queen Elizabeth,” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 2, no. 9, p. 458, 2013, doi: 10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n9p458.
[33] N. Iwamoto, “Modality and point of view in media discourse,” Retrieved Dec., vol. 17, pp. 173–200, 2007.
[34] D. L. Lillian, “Modality, persuasion and manipulation in Canadian conservative discourse,” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2008.
[35] A. Shakeel and A. H. Bin Sadiq, “Clause-level analysis of mood and modality in inaugural speeches: A corpus-based systemic functional grammar approach,” Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 62–80, 2025.
[36] P. H. Viet, Tro tu trong tieng Viet hien dai. Hanoi, Vietnam: Social Sciences Publishing House, 2003.

