Nghiên cứu về các nhân tố tác động đến sự chấp nhận sử dụng công nghệ đô thị thông minh của người dân thành phố Đà Nẵng
Tóm tắt: 272
| 
PDF: 176 
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Author
Từ khóa:
đô thị thông minh
sự chấp nhận sử dụng công nghệ
ý định hành vi
nỗ lực mong đợi
nhận thức độ bảo mật
niềm tin vào chính phủ
niềm tin vào công nghệ
Tóm tắt
Trong bối cảnh đô thị hóa nhanh chóng và các thách thức môi trường đi kèm, Việt Nam đã chọn đô thị thông minh làm giải pháp trọng tâm. Tuy nhiên, các nghiên cứu trước đây còn thiếu sót về việc đánh giá sự chấp nhận của người dân và vai trò của chính phủ trong quá trình này. Nghiên cứu này tập trung vào việc khảo sát các yếu tố: tin vào năng lực bản thân, nỗ lực mong đợi, nhận thức độ bảo mật, niềm tin vào chính phủ, niềm tin vào công nghê và giá trị giá cả ảnh hưởng đến sự chấp nhận sử dụng công nghệ đô thị thông minh của người dân Đà Nẵng, một thành phố tiên phong trong lĩnh vực này ở Việt Nam. Kết quả cho thấy, mỗi yếu tố trên đều tác động đến ý định sử dụng công nghệ đô thị thông minh. Bài báo sẽ đóng góp vào việc lấp đầy khoảng trống nghiên cứu về đô thị thông minh ở Việt Nam, đồng thời cung cấp thông tin hữu ích cho việc quản lý và phát triển đô thị thông minh tại Đà Nẵng và Việt Nam.
Tài liệu tham khảo
-
[1] World Bank Group, “Urban development”, worldbank.org, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overview [Accessed April 30, 2024]
[2] Ministry of Construction, “Urbanisation ratio expected to reach 53.9% in 2023”, moc.gov.vn, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://moc.gov.vn/vn/tin-tuc/1273/74982/urbanisation-ratio-expected-to-reach-53-9-in-2023.aspx [Accessed April 30, 2024]
[3] Ministry of Construction, “Smart city development should be considered from the planning stage”, moc.gov.vn, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://moc.gov.vn/vn/tin-tuc/1273/74511/smart-city-development-should-be-considered-from-the-planning-stage.aspx [Accessed April 30, 2024]
[4] T. Thanh, “Smart city development emphasizes people as priority: Hanoi vice chairman”, Hanoi Times, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://hanoitimes.vn/smart-city-development-emphasizes-people-as-priority-hanoi-vice-chairman-325496.html [Accessed April 30, 2024]
[5] C. Lin, G. Zhao, C. Yu, and Y. Wu, “Smart City Development and Residents’ Well-Being”, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 676, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11030676.
[6] T. Nam and T. A. Pardo, “Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions”, in Proc. 12th Annu. Int. Digit. Gov. Res. Conf.: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, College Park, MD, USA: ACM, Jun. 2011, pp. 282–291. doi: 10.1145/2037556.2037602.
[7] C. Harrison et al., “Foundations for Smarter Cities”, IBM J. Res. Dev., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1–16, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1147/JRD.2010.2048257.
[8] D. J. Toppeta, “The Smart City Vision: How innovation and ICT can build smart, ‘livable’, sustainable cities”, The Innovation Knowledge Foundation, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2010.
[9] R. G. Hollands, “Will the real smart city please stand up?: Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?”, in The Routledge.
[10] A. Radziejowska and B. Sobotka, “Analysis of the Social Aspect of Smart Cities Development for the Example of Smart Sustainable Buildings”, Energies, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 4330, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14144330.
[11] R. Giffinger et al., “Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities”, Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT, Report, Oct. 2007.
[12] M. Mauher and V. Smokvina, “Digital to intelligent local government transition framework”, in Proc. 29th Int. Conv. MIPRO, Opatija, Croatia, 2006, pp. 22–26.
[13] N. Z. Bawany and J. A. Shamsi, “Smart city architecture: Vision and challenges”, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1–11, 2015.
[14] R. Sutriadi, “Soft Infrastructure in Smart Sustainable Cities: A Literature Review”, J. Indones. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 4, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.46456/jisdep.v4i2.428.
[15] H. Chourabi et al., “Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework”, in Proc. 45th Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., Jan. 2012, pp. 2289–2297, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.
[16] P. A. Laplante, “Who’s afraid of big data?”, IT Prof., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 6–7, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1109/MITP.2013.86.
[17] J. Wan, M. Chen, F. Xia, L. Di, and K. Zhou, “From Machine-to-Machine Communications towards Cyber-Physical Systems”, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst., vol. 10, pp. 1105–1128, 2013, doi: 10.2298/CSIS120326018W.
[18] A. S. Elmaghraby and M. M. Losavio, “Cyber security challenges in Smart Cities: Safety, security and privacy”, J. Adv. Res., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 491–497, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.02.006.
[19] R. Bendor, “Value Replacement Therapy: Imagining urban technologies otherwise”, Delft University of Technology, in Speculative Design Methods for Citizen Engagement in Smart Cities Research, Report, 2021.
[20] T. Forester, Computers in the Human Context: Information Technology, Productivity, and People, 1st ed. MIT Press, 1989.
[21] F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology”, MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
[22] V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu, “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology”, MIS Q., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 157–178, 2012, doi: 10.2307/41410412.
[23] V. Venkatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View”, MIS Q., vol. 27, pp. 425–478, 2003, doi: 10.2307/30036540.
[24] Ministry of Construction, “Smart city vision in Vietnam”, moc.gov.vn, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://moc.gov.vn/tl/tin-tuc/52197/tam-nhin-do-thi-thong-minh-tai-viet-nam.aspx [Accessed April 30, 2024]
[25] People's Committee of Da Nang City, “Decision on promulgating the project on building a smart city in Da Nang city for the period 2018-2025, towards 2030”, No. 6439/QĐ-UBND, 2018.
[26] Danang Public Service Portal, “Information system for handling administrative procedures in Da Nang city”, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dichvucong.danang.gov.vn/ [Accessed April 30, 2024]
[27] S.-Y. Shin, D. Kim, and S. A. Chun, “Digital divide in advanced smart city innovations”, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 4076, 2021.
[28] M. Kauer-Franz, “Identification as determining factor of technology acceptance for hedonic and dual use products”, Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany, 2012.
[29] A. Habib, D. Alsmadi, and V. R. Prybutok, “Factors that determine residents’ acceptance of smart city technologies”, Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 610–623, 2020, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1693629.
[30] A. Bandura, “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency”, Am. Psychol., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 122–147, 1982.
[31] D. R. Compeau and C. A. Higgins, “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test”, MIS Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 189–211, 1995, doi: 10.2307/249688.
[32] J. Downey, “Measuring general computer self-efficacy: The surprising comparison of three instruments in predicting performance, attitudes, and usage”, in Proc. 39th Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. (HICSS’06), IEEE, 2006, pp. 210a–210a.
[33] B. Hernandez, J. Jimenez, and M. Jose Martin, “The impact of self-efficacy, ease of use and usefulness on e-purchasing: An analysis of experienced e-shoppers”, Interact. Comput., vol. 21, no. 1–2, pp. 146–156, 2009.
[34] N. Abdallah, O. Abdallah, and O. Bohra, “Factors affecting mobile learning acceptance in higher education: An empirical study”, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 664–671, 2021.
[35] P. Mcmanus, C. Standing, and R. Zanoli, “A preliminary laddering analysis on mobile services usage”, in Proc. 17th Eur. Conf. Inf. Syst., Verona, Italy, 2009.
[36] W. G. S. L. Schumann, “The Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Model”, Webology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2014.
[37] L. Van Zoonen, “Privacy concerns in smart cities”, Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 472–480, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.004.
[38] A. A. Alalwan, Y. K. Dwivedi, N. P. Rana, and R. Algharabat, “Examining factors influencing Jordanian customers’ intentions and adoption of internet banking: Extending UTAUT2 with risk”, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 40, pp. 125–138, 2018.
[39] T. Braun et al., “Security and Privacy Challenges in Smart Cities”, Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 39, pp. 499–507, 2018.
[40] I. AlHadid et al., “Predictors for E-government adoption of SANAD App services integrating UTAUT, TPB, TAM, Trust, and perceived risk”, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 19, no. 14, p. 8281, 2022.
[41] S. Ozkan and I. E. Kanat, “e-Government adoption model based on theory of planned behavior: Empirical validation”, Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 503–513, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.10.007.
[42] S. Castaldo, K. Premazzi, and F. Zerbini, “The meaning(s) of trust. A content analysis on the diverse conceptualizations of trust in scholarly research on business relationships”, J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 96, pp. 657–668, 2010.
[43] L. A. M. Nelloh, A. S. Santoso, and M. W. Slamet, “Will users keep using mobile payment? It depends on trust and cognitive perspectives”, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 1156–1164, 2019.
[44] J. Roca, J. García, and J. Vega, “The importance of perceived trust, security and privacy in online trading systems”, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur., vol. 17, pp. 96–113, 2009, doi: 10.1108/09685220910963983.
[45] D.-H. Shin, “The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption”, Interact. Comput., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 428–438, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.05.001.
[46] N. Almuraqab, “M-Government adoption factors in the UAE: a partial least squares approach”, Int. J. Bus. Inf., vol. 11, pp. 404–431, 2017.
[47] O. A. Hujran, “An assessment of Jordan’s e-government maturity: a user-centric perceptive”, Int. J. Electron. Gov., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 134, 2012, doi: 10.1504/IJEG.2012.049801.
[48] J. F. Hair Jr, M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins, and V. G. Kuppelwieser, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research”, Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 106–121, 2014.
[49] J. F. Hair, M. C. Howard, and C. Nitzl, “Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis”, J. Bus. Res., vol. 109, pp. 101–110, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.
[50] R. F. DeVellis and C. T. Thorpe, Scale Development: Theory and Applications. SAGE Publications, 2021.
[51] C. Hock, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “Management of multi-purpose stadiums: importance and performance measurement of service interfaces”, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag., vol. 14, no. 2–3, pp. 188–207, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1504/IJSTM.2010.034327.
[52] J. Garson, A Critical Overview of Biological Functions. Springer, 2016.
[53] L. Hu and P. M. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”, Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–55, 1999.
[54] S. Alawadhi and A. Morris, “The Use of the UTAUT Model in the Adoption of E-Government Services in Kuwait”, in Proc. 41st Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 2008, pp. 1–11.
[55] S.-Y. Hung, C.-M. Chang, and T.-J. Yu, “Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system”, Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 97–122, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.005.
[56] I. Arpaci, K. Kilicer, and S. Bardakci, “Effects of security and privacy concerns on educational use of cloud services”, Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 45, pp. 93–98, 2015.
[57] J. Sarabdeen and M. M. M. Ishak, “Impediment of Privacy in the Use of Clouds by Educational Institutions”, J. Adv. Inf. Technol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 167–172, 2015, doi: 10.12720/jait.6.3.167-172.
[58] S. Pearson, “Taking Account of Privacy when Designing Cloud Computing Services”, in ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering Challenges of Cloud Computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2009, pp. 44–52, doi: 10.1109/CLOUD.2009.5071532.
[59] V. Thomas, D. Wang, L. Mullagh, and N. Dunn, “Where’s Wally? In Search of Citizen Perspectives on the Smart City”, Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8030207.
[60] I. Arpaci, Y. Y. Cetin, and O. Turetken, “Impact of Perceived Security on Organizational Adoption of Smartphones”, Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 602–608, 2015.
Xem thêm
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Đã Xuất bản
Aug 31, 2025
Download
Cách trích dẫn
Phương, N. N. U., T. A. Đào, Đinh T. Ánh Huyền, và N. T. T. Na. “Nghiên cứu về các nhân tố tác động đến sự chấp nhận sử dụng công nghệ đô thị thông Minh của người dân thành phố Đà Nẵng”. Tạp Chí Khoa học Và Công nghệ - Đại học Đà Nẵng, vol 23, số p.h 8A, Tháng Tám 2025, tr 41-51, doi:10.31130/ud-jst.2025.23(8A).424.
